Wednesday - May 19, 2004

Sitting on the Fence

For some reason, something a few days ago reminded me of a time in middle school where—I think Mr. Johnson was the teacher—I was instructed to research about some current-day issue of importance and write an essay about it. That was fine, but there was the additional requirement that I had to take a side in the essay, and I was to be firm about it. Quite a few essays in school seem to have that requirement; one has to take a side and aren't allowed to use such phrases that make your writing seem anything other than utter certainty. But it bothered me that time, because I knew I couldn't possibly do a good enough job in that short of a time to make a satisfactory informed opinion for that large of an issue. Mr. Johnson just said that sitting on the fence was bad to do. While I do think it is important to learn techniques to be persuasive—and perhaps being forced to take a side ensures better research due to a fear of looking like an utter idiot in the essay—it seems equally important to me to be able to look at two sides and admit that things are inconclusive. There may simply not be enough data, or both sides may seem equally as viable. Throughout school, they always seemed to encourage kids to take a stand even in these situations. It's a useful tool to pretend to take a side for the sake of playing devil's advocate and to explore an issue; but they never seemed to emphasize being careful to not jump to conclusions, unless the conclusion was blatantly incorrect. The exception was the realm of science, where precision and certainty have mostly been reduced to, well, a science. Another anecdote to share: In Mrs. Worthington's class, a Muslim came to speak with us about Islam. He had a spiel about how facts weren't always true; his examples consisted of a lot of statistics that seemed to imply a conclusion, which he would then proceed to discredit. I wanted to stop him and explain that the facts themselves were true (assuming the statistics were accurate), and merely the interpretation was incorrect. You shouldn't throw away facts just because they might be misleading. Take the facts into consideration, but also take into consideration of how much you don't know. Occam's Razor is incredibly inaccurate when facts are few. Still, an informed decision is infinitely better than one that is not. So long as they're not burning, some fences deserve to be sat upon for a while.
23:56 PST
Classified as Thought

Related Entries

Responses

I think I had my ass burnt a few times. but i'll keep on that fence. Highly enjoyed this entry of yours, david.

Posted by matt wei at May 20, 2004 10:24 PST | #1

Pointy fences probably aren't so good to sit on either. Too sharp.

Seriously though: I wholeheartedly agree with you.
It's the fences themselves that I find myself objecting to. I have a lot of strong opinions, and (politically speaking (as usual)) I have a greater respect for people who stand up for their convictions because they believe in them regardless of public pressure...but that's different than parceling issues up into little boxes and saying "pick one." When I defend my opinions I've got to know what I'm defending them against--and that means understanding and respecting other (not just The Other, but all of them) ways of looking at things.

There's a Robert Frost poem about this. Do good fences really make good neighbors? Easy neighbors, maybe, because if you shore up your facts and howl loudly enough you'll drown out anything else that might unsettle your barricade. But something there is that does not love a wall.

Posted by emilym at May 20, 2004 17:20 PST | #2

School essays are meant to strangle our literary abbilities, they are just time-fillers. It'll be over sooner than you know it. Sitting on fences is good for reflection, and sometimes that's what we need to go on.

Posted by Euphoria at May 21, 2004 16:14 PST | #3

Post a response










Remember personal info?