Tuesday - July 12, 2005

Weekly Log 11

Life

I have new glasses. No pictures of them yet. They're smaller and haven't been triggering negative comments thus far.

Thoughts

I have a theory that home entertainment, particularly television, has the major side effect of extremely weakening the strength of local communities, personal interactions, and political duty.

Links

vnc2swf. *nix program that allows you to make a Flash animation from any VNC source. On Mac OS X 10.4, in addition to needing to install ming (using Fink), X11, and the X11 SDK; I also had to switch to using gcc 3.3 instead of 4.0 by typing in sudo gcc_select 3.3 in the terminal. To actually run vnc2swf, I had to type in the command in the X11 console; it didn't work in the normal terminal. The video is not the most impressive, but it's certainly better than nothing!

Javascript Form Validation. Been using a bit of Javascript at work. This seems like a pretty good form validation method. Nothing obnoxious, cross-browser, and it degrades gracefully when Javscript is turned off.

lesscode.org: Unecessary Until Proven Required. A different way of thinking about the YAGNI principle. It seems a more useful way of thinking about it. It's also important to remember that this is just one extreme… a little bit of forethought and abstraction can go a long way in predicting possible future extensions. People often guess incorrectly, but hey, I certainly think you can get better at it and that practice is the only way. But it is good to remember that there's a cost for every abstraction and forward-planning consideration that one makes.

10:30 PST
Classified as Weekly Log

Related Entries

Responses

Hehe, I like the way you phrased that- "haven't been triggering negative comments thus far." I'm sure they look great.

Posted by Cortni at Jul 12, 2005 13:57 PST | #1

Have you read Bowling Alone? It's a fairly short piece by Harvard professor Robert Putnam on the decay of civic community, its implications, and theories about its causes, and he heavily emphasizes tv and home entertainment. I'll try to find a link, I'd be interested to hear what you think of it.

Posted by emilym at Jul 12, 2005 18:51 PST | #2

There's actually a full book based upon the eponymous journal article now, Emily. Quite an interesting read, even if "social capital" is one of the most amorphous terms ever thought of...

Shigs

Posted by Shigeru at Jul 12, 2005 19:39 PST | http://fallenearth.org/blogs/shigeru | #3

actually my comparative politics teacher heaped considerable scorn on poor Dr. Putnam. But then he ended the lecture with this object lesson:

"Now you see what he did, though, class? By coining a few terms and a method for quantifying them, he got Harvard and the federal government to give him grants to spend twenty years in Italy talking to people over drinks. That's the part you want to take notes on."

Posted by emilym at Jul 13, 2005 21:31 PST | #4

I'm not sure the whole book necessary. Here's the article though.

http://xroads.virginia.edu/~HYPER/DETOC/assoc/bowling.html

Posted by emilym at Jul 13, 2005 21:32 PST | #5

Thanks much for the link, Emily. My own thoughts on the matter are not very developed right now, but this article seems very interesting. I am curious about what your comparative politics teacher had to say about Putnam.

Posted by David Chen at Jul 13, 2005 22:06 PST | http://fallenearth.org/blogs/caiuschen/ | #6

I tend to heap my own scorn on Putnam too... but mostly that's because I'm contrary. I've read "Bowling Alone," but I'm inclined to see that my experience does not reflect what he says is happening. TV is a social thing in my life. It's a chance for family or friends to sit down for an hour in the same room and talk during commercials (or the show, unless it's West Wing). I almost never watch TV alone unless I'm totally desperate, and while I do use my computer alone (that being another gadget getting in the way of human interactions) I tend to use it to communicate with people I care about (ala typing this comment.)

I would argue that the nature of human interaction is changing, but as long as we remember that people are more important than machines, we're fine.

That's my two philosophical cents for the day!

Posted by Melissa at Jul 14, 2005 00:15 PST | #7

I don't so much agree that tvs are taking down culture, but mostly because I think people are so lazy that they would find other ways of amusing themselves that didn't involve wandering far from their homes.

Also, as the whole electrical convenience thing cropped up, it did give people more time in many respects. (Don't have to do things by hand and all) So it also took that time and gave us something to do with it. So maybe we seem to be wasting time away from others, but are actually just wasting time we could be doing something less pleasant.

Posted by Madge at Jul 15, 2005 20:29 PST | #8

Post a response










Remember personal info?